Bowden v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis
767 F.2d 761 · 1985
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably State v. Powell (1990), Clisby v. Jones (1992)
32 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Ake v. Oklahoma · Hudson v. Palmer · Hance v. Zant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant offers 'little more than undeveloped assertions that the requested assistance would beneficial, we find no deprivation of due process in the trial judge's decision.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“his sanity at the time of the offense is to be a significant factor at trial....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]nlike the sentencing situation in Ake , ... [the] prosecutor had no need to present psychiatric evidence to show an aggravating factor and he presented none. The dangers and inequities which concerned the Court in Ake consequently did not exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.