Cure v. Cure’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carr v. Carr · McKay v. McKay · Hay v. Hay · Lea v. Lea · McQueen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) The child: (A) is at least eighteen (18) years of age; (B) has not attended a secondary or postsecondary school for the prior four (4) months and is not enrolled in a secondary or postsecondary school; and (C) is or is capable of supporting himself or herself through employment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bales v. Bales · Willard v. Peak“testified that she desired to have a relationship with her father and that, in her opinion, their relationship could be reconciled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[A] parent's child support obligation terminates when a child is emancipated or reaches age 21, except in certain cireumstances.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bales v. Bales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.