Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 P.2d 504 - C.S. v. Nielson

C.S. v. Nielson’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
9
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2003

11 state decisions

80198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Logarusic v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Baginsky v. United States · Escambia County v. McMillan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cause of action whereby parents claim they would have avoided conception or terminated an existing pregnancy by abortion but for the negligence of those charged with, among other things, prenatal testing or counseling as to the likelihood of giving birth to a physically or mentally impaired child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A cause of action shall not arise, and damages shall not be awarded, on behalf of any person, based on the claim that but for the act or omission of another, a person would not have been permitted to have been born alive but would have been aborted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[al reasonable, prudent person or persons in Plaintiffs' position would not have consented to the health care rendered after having been fully informed as to all facts relevant to the decision to give consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.