Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 P.2d 557 - Larson v. Sysco Corp.

Larson v. Sysco Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2025

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

8019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fortune v. National Cash Register Co. · 11 Utah 2d 289 - Samms v. Eccles · Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation District · Staggie v. Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc. · Girard v. Appleby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Speculative injury as to some future difficulty does not give rise to a cause of action as defamatory per se.”). Indeed, because a defamation action provides a remedy for concrete harm to one’s reputation, plaintiffs who cannot show such damage should, in any event, refrain from filing suit precipitously and then hoping to exploit discov ery tools to uncover some previously unknown negative comment. The strengthened version of Rule 11 only bolsters that prescription. See Utah R. Civ. P. 11 (b) (When presenting a complaint to the court, an attorney certifies”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “allege criminal conduct on the part of the plaintiff or impute the contracting of some loathsome disease, unchaste behavior (on the part of a woman) or conduct which is incongruous with the exercise of a lawful business, trade, profession, or office.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “where the defendant intentionally engaged in some conduct toward the plaintiff, (a) with the purpose of inflicting emotional distress, or, (b) where any reasonable person would have known that such would result; and his actions are of such a nature as to be considered outrageous and intolerable in that they offend against the generally accepted standards of decency and morality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.