Graves v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · 724 So. 2d 280 - Smith v. State · Caracci v. International Paper Co. · Hemphill v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our standard for review is whether the trial court abused its discretion in its decision. This Court must decide whether the ... court could have entered the order which it did. Under this standard, this Court will affirm unless there is a definite and firm conviction that the court below committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon weighing of relevant factors.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the informer is an actual participant in the alleged crime, the accused is entitled to know who he is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not a material witness to the guilt or innocence of the accused,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.