Mitchell v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp. · 110 Cal. App. 3d 884 - In Re Marriage of Hopson · 622 So. 2d 1264 - Ash v. Ash · Smith v. Jones · Owens, by and Through, Mosley v. Huffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If it was raised before or simultaneously with an answer or other responsive pleading, the objection is not waived by filing other pleadings, or even by participating in a trial on the merits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If, however, the objection is not raised until after an answer or other pleadings are filed (other than motions for continuance not considered to be a general appearance), the objection is waived per Rule 12(h).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when making a pre-answer motion, or neither made by motion nor included in a responsive pleading or an amendment permitted by Rule 15(a)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.