Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 SO2D 272 - Crenshaw v. Crenshaw

Crenshaw v. Crenshaw’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brabham v. Brabham · 652 So. 2d 1113 - Brooks v. Brooks · 614 So. 2d 394 - Smith v. Smith · 626 So. 2d 140 - Daigle v. Daigle · 711 So. 2d 884 - Richard v. Richard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) endanger life, limb, or health, or create a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief, or (2) be so unnatural and infamous as to make the marriage revolting to the non-offending spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of marriage, thus destroying any basis for its continuance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the health of the husband and his earning capacity; (2) the health of the wife and her earning capacity; (3) the entire source of income of both parties; (4) the reasonable needs of the wife; (5) the reasonable needs of the child; (6) the necessary living expenses of the husband; (7) the estimated amount of income taxes the respective parties must pay on their incomes; (8) the fact that the wife has the free use of the home, furnishings, and automobile, and (9) such other facts and circumstances bearing on the subject that might be shown by the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Habitual cruel and inhuman treatment is not the catch-all category to permit a divorce when a marriage is suffering difficulties, and absent an agreement by the spouses that would permit an irreconcilable differences divorce, neither party is entitled to be granted a divorce without providing the proof necessary to support the grounds that are alleged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.