767 So. 2d 446 - NW v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
31 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 574 So. 2d 1066 - Kight v. Dugger · 688 So. 2d 1027 - GRA v. State · E.J. v. State · MG v. State · 677 So. 2d 270 - TR v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presents a controversy capable of repetition, yet evading review”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[B]ecause the withholding of adjudication may subject the juvenile to the jurisdiction and control of the court for a longer period than if an adjudication of delinquency occurs, the juvenile courts are required to fully inform the juvenile of such facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may not exceed the term for which sentence could be imposed if the child were committed for the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.