Mandri v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-07-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2002

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“WHERE A TRIAL COURT FAILS TO FILE WRITTEN REASONS IN SUPPORT OF A GUIDELINES DEPARTURE SENTENCE BUT, THEREAFTER, IN RESPONSE TO A FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(B) MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT, DOES FILE WRITTEN REASONS JUSTIFYING THE DEPARTURE, IS DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO A REVERSAL AND A REMAND FOR A GUIDELINES SENTENCE, UNDER MADDOX V. STATE, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000)?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Mandri v. State

Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-07-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *524ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

¶2We deny defendant’s motion for rehearing. We grant defendant’s motion to certify the following question of great public importance:

WHERE A TRIAL COURT FAILS TO FILE WRITTEN REASONS IN SUPPORT OF A GUIDELINES DEPARTURE SENTENCE BUT, THEREAFTER, IN RESPONSE TO A FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(B) MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT, DOES FILE WRITTEN REASONS JUSTIFYING THE DEPARTURE, IS DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO A REVERSAL AND A REMAND FOR A GUIDELINES SENTENCE, UNDER MADDOX v. STATE, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000)?

¶3Question certified.