Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 SO2D 524 - Sierra v. Shevin

Sierra v. Shevin’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

49 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 585 So. 2d 1068 - Hancock v. Department of Corrections · 671 So. 2d 166 - Walsingham v. Dockery · 730 So. 2d 344 - Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for COGSA purposes. In this case, there was no such agreement. We review a summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party — here, the appellant, Interested Underwriters. If the”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the court may neither adjudge the credibility of the witnesses nor weigh the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.