Lanes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Stull v. State (1989), Hidalgo v. State (1999)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Brinegar v. United States · Gault
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) to provide for the care, the protection, and the wholesome moral, mental, and physical development of children coming within its provisions; (2) to protect the welfare of the community and to control the commission of unlawful acts by children; (3) consistent with the protection of the public interest, to remove from children committing unlawful acts the taint of criminality and the consequences of criminal behavior and to substitute a program of treatment, training, and rehabilitation; (4) to achieve the foregoing purposes in a family environment whenever possible, separating the child from his parents only when necessary for his welfare or in the interest of public safety and when a child is removed from his family, to give him the care that should be provided by parents; and (5) to provide a simple judicial procedure through which the provisions of this title are executed and enforced and in which the parties are assured a fair hearing and their constitutional and other legal rights recognized and enforced.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. SDG v. State · Matter of EQ“system wherein juveniles were rehabilitated rather than incarcerated, protected rather than punished the very antithesis of the adult criminal system.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. SDG v. State · In Re JBM“balance[ ] the function that [the asserted] constitutional or procedural right serve[s] against its impact or degree of impairment on the unique processes of the juvenile court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In re H.C. · In Re MP
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.