Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 F.2d 1181 - Walker v. McLain

Walker v. McLain’s Empirical Analysis

768 F.2d 1181 · 1985

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
22
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc. (1987), Liming v. Damos (2012)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 22 states

1601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gideon v. Wainwright · Gault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]rom the perspective of the person incarcerated, the jail is just as bleak no matter which label [civil or criminal contempt] is used.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he argument that ... the defendant holds the keys to the jailhouse door does not apply to diminish the defendant's liberty interest. A defendant found in contempt and incarcerated does not hold the keys to the jailhouse door if the defendant cannot pay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[slince petitioner may suffer collateral consequences following from his contempt conviction, his case is not moot ... The state may, for example, rely on the finding of contempt in determining child visitation rights or in other child support proceeding ... Thus, we find the case not to be moot despite petitioner's release from confinement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.