Code Inc v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 1210 · 1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2344 · 7 U.S.C. § 136N
Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, (Two Cases). B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, and Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. And Hilt Truck Line, Inc., Intervenor-Respondents · Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Midwestern Transportation, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Koppel, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well known that the ICC's authority in these matters is broad, and our scope of review narrow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.