Jackson v. Veterans Administration’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 1325 · 1985
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Caluza v. Brown (1995), Haebe v. Department of Justice (2002)
36 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co. · Hayes v. Department of the Navy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The MSPB must afford special deference to the presiding official's findings respecting credibility where the presiding official relies expressly or by necessary implication on the demeanor of the witnesses.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ubstantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“board has the power in appropriate cases to substitute its judgment for that of the presiding official with respect to the credibility of witnesses.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.