Exchange National Bank v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 140 · 1985
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Mid-State Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago (1989), Haynesworth v. Miller (1987)
37 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1972 · 15 U.S.C. § 14 (§ 3 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1006
Relies on Times-Picayune Pub Co v. United States · Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. · Kelly v. Kosuga · Exchange National Bank v. Daniels · United States v. Dial
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court has construed § 1972 as prohibiting exclusive dealing practices— those that attempt to prevent customers from dealing with other banks.... It is similar to other anti-tying laws meant to preserve competition among rival businesses. We treat it, in other words, as the banking equivalent of § 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14 . It does not prevent banks from making one in-house loan contingent on another. The Borrowers do not say that the Bank forced them to take credit from the Bank when they really wanted to borrow the money _ somewhere else.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statute also does not say that any actual loan in violation of its terms is unenforceable. Section 1975 permits a treble damage action by an injured party, but an obligation to pay back a loan actually made is not an injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.