Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 F.2d 287 - Gregory v. Auger

Gregory v. Auger’s Empirical Analysis

768 F.2d 287 · 1985

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
April 2006
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably Stephen L. Ustrak, Cross-Appellant v. James W. Fairman, Cross-Appellee (1986), Hill v. Blackwell (1985)

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

160198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Procunier v. Martinez · Pell v. Procunier · Grady v. Wilken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “could properly have established mail policies far more restrictive than this,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'have available sanctions that impose incremental disadvantages on those already imprisoned.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “cellblock fires have been eliminated entirely ... by new regulations prohibiting inmates from possessing matches.”). Neither expert testified about fires in administrative segregation in Alabama prisons. 10 . See Tr.-l at 95 (According to plaintiffs expert, fire safety is considerably less of a problem in administrative segregation than in the general population.). 11 . One other court in Alabama has ruled in an unpublished opinion that Regulation 433’s ban on subscription publications is constitutional under Turner because it was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.