American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2718 v. Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 348 · 1985
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2018
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 5596 · 5 U.S.C. § 7121 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Cornelius v. Nutt · Grigsby v. U.S. Department of Commerce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an amount equal to all or any part of the pay, allowances, or differentials, as applicable which the employee normally would have earned or received during the period if the personnel action had not occurred, less any amounts earned by the employee through other employment during that period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the fact that [the grievant] suffered over six months loss of income is as much attributable to her as it is to the Agency's erroneous conclusion of law. For that reason, the [arbitrator] cannot award [the grievant] any back pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the decision maker has reversed an agency imposed removal or suspension action, precisely because the action was 'unjustified or unwarranted'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.