Coughlin v. Regan’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 468 · 1985
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably BIW Deceived v. Local S6, Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America (1997), Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co. (1992)
23 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6402
Relies on Swift & Co. v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp. · Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum · Nashville St Ry Co v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While it is possible for a party to consent to a judgment and still preserve his right to appeal, he must reserve that right unequivocally, as it will not be presumed.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“Relief on appeal from a consent judgment is available only on a showing of either lack of actual consent, fraud in obtaining consent, lack of federal jurisdiction, or mistake.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is uncontested that a party to a consent judgment is thereby deemed to waive any objections it has to matters within the scope of the judgment.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Charles Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Jim L. Clymer v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Gary Bailey, Dwayne Hope, Jimmy Hope, Patty Hudson, Glenda Morton, Charles Edwards Owens, Victor E. Silva, Kim Louise Souders v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, the General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union 886, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Gary Bailey, Dwayne Hope, Jimmy Hope, Patty Hudson, Glenda Morton, Charles Edwards Owens, Victor E. Silva, Kim Louise Souders v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co., an Oklahoma Corporation, Household International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Household Merchandising, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and the General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union 886, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America · Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.