Cockerham v. Garvin’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 784 · 1985
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2011
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1335 · 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982) · 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Relies on New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Kansas City · Conley v. Maattala · 343 F. Supp. 692 - Palmer v. Sterling Drugs, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he [injured person] and tortfeasor specifically agreed that part of the money paid over to the [injured person] would be held in escrow pending a claim by the [United States] for specific medical bills....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.