McLaurin v. Fischer’s Empirical Analysis
768 F.2d 98 · 1985
Citation profile
74 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Ercegovich v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (1998), United States v. Pickett (1991)
74 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Foman v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f an appellant . . . chooses to designate specific determinations in his notice of appeal -- rather than simply appealing from the entire judgment -- only the specified issues may be raised on appeal.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he Ohio Supreme Court has held that the elements and burden of proof in a state age discrimination claim are the same as in a federal case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“By appealing from the district court’s final order, [appellant] effectively preserved for review all of the district court’s non-final rulings and orders ... ”); see also Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co., 915 F.2d 201, 206 (6th Cir.1990) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.