Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 F.2d 991 - United States v. Ray

United States v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis

768 F.2d 991 · 1985

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2009 · most notably Henderson v. United States (1986), United States v. Gambino (1995)

55 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

330198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3041 · 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Ingraham v. Wright · United States v. Pollock · United States v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]ection 3162(a)(1), which specifies dismissal as the sanction for excessive preindictment delay, requires not only that the defendant be arrested, but that the arrest be based on a charge that is contained in a complaint filed against the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]n arrest on state charges does not trigger the 30-day period of § 3161(b) for purposes of a subsequent indictment on federal charges.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.