Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 F.3d 212 - Baptiste v. Sommers

Baptiste v. Sommers’s Empirical Analysis

768 F.3d 212 · 2014

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Crosby · Lucas v. Miles · Palmieri v. Defaria · Teresa Alvarez, Cross-Appellee v. Simmons Market Research Bureau, Inc. And Jwt Group, Inc., Cross-Appellants · LeSane v. Hall's Security Analyst, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the duration of the plaintiffs failure to comply with the court order, (2) whether plaintiff was on notice that failure to comply would result in dismissal, (3) whether the defendants are likely to be prejudiced by further delay in the proceedings, (4) a balancing of the court’s interest in managing its docket with the plaintiffs interest in receiving a fair chance to be heard, and (5) whether the judge has adequately considered a sanction less drastic than dismissal.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when the circumstances are sufficiently extreme,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.