Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 F.3d 806 - Tatum v. Moody

Tatum v. Moody’s Empirical Analysis

768 F.3d 806 · 2014

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Hensley v. Eckerhart · Pearson v. Callahan · Monroe v. Pape

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Deliberate indifference is the conscious or reckless disregard of the consequences of one's acts or omissions. It entails something more than negligence but is satisfied by something less than acts or omissions for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no reasonable jury viewing the summary judgment record could find by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff is entitled to a favorable verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]here actual deliberation [by the officer] is practical,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.