Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 P2D 1102 - Vaden v. State

Vaden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Hampton v. United States · Kinsella v. United States Ex Rel. Singleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “illegal conduct of the government is not a per se bar to prosecution; the test is whether the government’s conduct is outrageous enough to warrant dismissal of the charges.” Id. at 1107 (citations omitted). As a general premise, to be outrageous enough to bar prosecution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.