Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 P2D 558 - Bigelow v. State

Bigelow v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2009

10 state decisions

60198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. Nixon · Bourjaily v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act. The crime of conspiracy is complete when an agreement has been made and overt acts performed to further the unlawful design."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(d) Statements which are not hearsay. — A statement is not hearsay if: [[Image here]] (2) Admission by Party-Opponent. — The statement is offered against a party and is ... (E) a statement by a co-conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) A person is guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime if he agrees with one (1) or more persons that they or one (1) or more of them will commit a crime and one (1) or more of them does an overt act to effect the objective of the agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.