Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 P2D 590 - Matthews v. Fetzner

Matthews v. Fetzner’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Ten Mile Industrial Park v. Western Plains Service Corp. · Delgue v. Curutchet · Roush v. Roush · Baldwin v. Dube

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the issue decided in the prior adjudication was identical with the issue presented in the present action; (2) whether the prior adjudication resulted in a judgment on the merits; (3) whether the party against whom collateral estoppel is asserted was a party or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication; and (4) whether the party against whom collateral estoppel is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the pri- or proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.