Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 SO2D 1050 - Trease v. State

Trease v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

85 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Lockett v. Ohio · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Hitchcock v. Dugger · Hopkins v. Reeves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he relative weight given each mitigating factor is within the discretion of the sentencing court.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Discretion is abused only `when the judicial action is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, which is another way of saying that discretion is abused only where no reasonable [person] would take the view adopted by the trial court.'”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Trease told her that the victim had to be killed because he could identify them, in addition to evidence that the victim would have been able to identify Trease if he had lived because he and Trease were acquaintances”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.