Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 768 So. 2d 109 - State v. Dorsey

768 So. 2d 109 - State v. Dorsey’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lombard v. Marcera · 365 So. 2d 1304 - State v. Phillips · Carriere v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury · Parish v. Parker · 711 So. 2d 738 - State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an unpublished opinion we found that the record failed to show that the Defendant waived his right to a jury trial. The record showed that after being advised of this right at arraignment, the Defendant was given 15 days to decide what he wanted to do. His attorney filed a written motion for a bench trial, but it was signed only by the attorney. The motion was not filed in open court, nor was there any record evidence that it was signed in open court. It was mailed to the judge from the attorney’s office and apparently signed in chambers. From these facts, we found that the record was silent as to a knowing and intelligent waiver. We cited law that such a waiver | ¡¡cannot be presumed. Because the filing of a formal motion by the Defendant’s counsel was some indi-cia in the record of a waiver, we remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to a jury trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.