Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · State v. Callaway · Burdick v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Despite its widespread use, rule 3.850 does not provide a mechanism for further review as a matter of course in every criminal case. To the contrary, the rule affords an extraordinary remedy for a limited class of errors that cannot be corrected on direct appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a claim that the sentence is illegal can be asserted at any time in a proceeding under rule 3.800(a) even if it could have been raised earlier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mitchell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.