Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

768 So. 2d 467

Bernal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-06-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2003

2 state decisions

Relies on Pavey v. State · Ashby v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Juan Jose Bernal appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s order without discussion. However, to the extent that Bernal raises claims of trial court error or improper actions by the state attorney that were preserved for appellate review, but not raised on direct appeal, our affirmance is without prejudice to Bernal now raising them in a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j). This court will consider as timely filed any such petition filed within 30 days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See, e.g., Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563*468(Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Ashby v. State, 752 So.2d 698 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

¶2Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
/768/so2d/467 · .json · Public domain