Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 525 So. 2d 420 - Florida Bar v. Levey · 441 So. 2d 1079 - Drake v. State · 700 So. 2d 791 - Melendez v. State · 760 So. 2d 988 - McCray v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial court should exercise discretion to exclude modestly relevant evidence when the danger of unfair prejudice from its admission substantially outweighs its probative value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.