Beall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · 644 So. 2d 451 - Moody v. State · Roland v. State · 708 So. 2d 73 - Ford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must specifically allege facts showing that effective assistance of counsel was not in fact rendered, and he must allege with specificity the fact that but for such purported actions by ineffective counsel, the results of the trial court decision would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.