Evans v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Medina · Talley v. State · Waggoman v. Fort Worth Well Machinery & Supply Co. · Krider v. Hempftling · 91 Tex. Crim. 582 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Tex.R.App.P. 74(f)(1) requires the facts that are pertinent to a point of error are to be stated, with reference to the pages in the record where the same may be found in an appellate brief. Failure to do this constitutes waiver of their consideration. Inpetco, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Houston N.A., 722 S.W.2d 721 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, writ refd n.r.e.).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.