Gallardo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 144th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Balistrieri v. United States · Barbee v. State · 390 So. 2d 322 - Rubin v. State · Ex Parte Dickerson · 165 Tex. Crim. 252 - Donald v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... One may not be convicted of a lesser included offense if the period of limitation for the lesser offense has expired notwithstanding the fact that one could be convicted of the greater crime or offense charged in the indictment due to a longer applicable period of limitation. Citing McKinney v. State, 96 Tex.Crim. 342 , 257 S.W. 258 (1923); Alston v. State, supra; Peacock v. State, 690 S.W.2d 613 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1985); 21 AM.JuR.2d, Criminal Law § 225, p. 411.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yount
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.