Kiser v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lilly v. State · Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Adams · Pope v. State · Williamson v. State · State v. Kaiama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is sufficient if the evidence establishes that the fact sought to be proven, here the claim of misidentification, is more probable when supported by the proffered evidence that it would be without it.”) (citing 1 McCormick on Evidence, § 185 (5 th ed.1999)). . Id. . 769 A.2d 736 (Del.2001) . Id. at 738-39 . . Id. at 738 . . Id. . Id. at 739 . . Id. at 740-42 . . Id.; D.R.E. 403 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Watkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.