Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 769 F.3d 1073 - SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

769 F.3d 1073 · 2014

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
October 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2023

6 federal appellate · 3 district ·

22020142020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 284 · 35 U.S.C. § 285

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Farrar v. Hobby · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd · Phillips v. AWH Corp. · General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[GJeneral expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used.”). We note that the Federal Circuit, whose decision was under review in High-mark, has continued since that case to review de novo a district court's determination of whether a party was the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]nitial rejection by the Patent and Trademark Office of original claims that later were confirmed on reexamination hardly justifies a goo'd faith belief in the invalidity of the claims.”). . In Octane Fitness, the Supreme Court rejected the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]hat relief must materially alter the legal relationship between the parties by modifying one party's behavior in a way that 'directly benefits' the opposing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.