Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 769 F.3d 1221 - United States v. Bear

United States v. Bear’s Empirical Analysis

769 F.3d 1221 · 2014

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Addington v. Texas · United States v. Stoterau · United States v. Weber · United States v. Teague · United States v. Kent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) be reasonably related to the nature and circumstances of the offense, the defendant’s history and character, the deterrence of the criminal conduct, the protection of the public from future crimes of the defendant, or the defendant’s educational, vocational, medical, or other correctional needs; (2) involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary to achieve the purpose of deterring criminal activity, protecting the public, and promoting the defendant’s rehabilitation; -and (3) be consistent with any pertinent policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) is reasonably related to the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), and (a)(2)(D); (2) involves no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary for the purposes set forth in section 3553(a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), and (a)(2)(D); and (3) is consistent with any pertinent policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]here a broad condition of supervised release is ambiguous and could be read as restricting a significant liberty interest, we construe the condition narrowly so as to avoid affecting that significant liberty interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.