Teichmann v. New York’s Empirical Analysis
769 F.3d 821 · 2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Heck v. Humphrey · Imbler v. Pachtman · Spencer v. Kemna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“recognized an exception to Heck's favorable termination requirement when habeas was never reasonably available to the plaintiff through no lack of diligence on [plaintiff's] part-that is, where an action under § 1983 was a diligent plaintiff's only opportunity to challenge his conviction in a federal forum.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Opperisano v. Jones“[W]hat does remain an open question, even in this Circuit, is perhaps even more difficult: whether Heck bars [ section] 1983 suits when the plaintiff has intentionally defaulted his habeas claims. I know of no other circuit cases that allow [ section] 1983 claims to proceed in such circumstances ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Opperisano v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.