Mohamed v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
769 F.3d 885 · 2014
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Padilla v. Kentucky · Yousefi v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · 33 Cal. 4th 254 - In Re Alva · Medina v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“convicted of ... a crime involving moral turpitude.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he phrase 'involving moral turpitude' ... refers to more than simply the wrong inherent in violating the statute. Otherwise the requirement ... would be superfluous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must involve conduct that not only violates a statute but also independently violates a moral norm.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.