People v. Sundermeyer’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Vazquez v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare · 28 Cal. 3d 376 - People v. Kurland · United States v. Ellison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the omitted facts rendered the affidavit substantially misleading to the judge who issued the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Fortune“as to the truth or the sufficiency of the facts set forth in the affidavit to establish probable cause”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Fortune“were not adverse and ... merely buttressed the facts which supported the issuance of the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Fortune
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.