Nobles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baumgartner v. Joughin · 395 So. 2d 540 - Wakulla County v. Davis · 656 So. 2d 470 - Miele v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. · 492 So. 2d 1051 - Williams v. State · 685 So. 2d 1210 - State v. Dugan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 918.12, Florida Statutes!,] expressly prohibits an attempt to threaten or influence any person who has been summoned for jury duty and might be called upon to serve on a; jury .... By its terms, the statute proscribes not only an attempt to threaten or influence a person serving as a juror in a pending case, but also in any matter “which may by law be brought, before [that person] as a juror.” Because a case might be brought before any person who receives a summons to report for jury duty dur ing the period of time in which the case is scheduled for trial, we conclude that the term “juror” necessarily refers to prospective jurors as well as active jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gammage v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.