Thames v. State

Oliver THAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-09-28

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2012

11 state decisions

Relies on 764 So. 2d 829 - Hampton v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appellant, pro se.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The appellant appeals the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which he argues that his sentence is illegal because the trial court improperly retained jurisdiction over his case in violation of Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of our recent opinion in Hampton v. State,764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

¶5REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

¶6ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.