Harris v. State

Laron HARRIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 27, 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-10-27

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2004

3 state decisions

Relies on Hall v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Laron Harris, Daytona Beach, pro se.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The pro se petition for belated appeal in this proceeding did not contain petitioner's signature, nor did it contain an oath by petitioner that the alleged facts were true. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin.2060(e); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(2)(F); Hall v. State,746 So.2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (holding that petition filed pursuant to Rule 9.140(j) was facially insufficient, since it was not made under oath). We therefore deny the petition without prejudice to petitioner to refile a signed, sworn petition.

¶5PETITION DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

¶6THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON, and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.