769 So. 2d 583 - State ex rel. C.O'C.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State, in Interest of Wilkerson · 673 So. 2d 1123 - State ex rel. D.S. · Printworks, Inc. v. Ernst W. Dorn Co. · 543 So. 2d 634 - State, in Interest of Lucas · 693 So. 2d 257 - State ex rel. R.W.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A delinquency proceeding and a FINS proceeding are two very distinct proceedings from which different consequences result. In a delinquency proceeding, a juvenile can be adjudicated guilty of a crime and sentenced accordingly.... In a FINS proceeding, however, the juvenile's family comes under the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court to remedy the problems which cause the child to be self-destructive. The court has the authority to establish a family service plan which is binding on all family members and all appropriate service providers. The family service plan requires the family members to participate in a plan of services which are intended to remedy the family's dysfunction which is causing the juvenile to need court supervision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.