Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 769 So. 2d 974 - Asay v. State

769 So. 2d 974 - Asay v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 98 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley · Lockett v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely because the defendant has now secured the testimony of a more favorable mental health expert.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “deprived the defendant of a reliable penalty phase proceeding.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]rial counsel was not deficient where the defendant had been examined prior to trial by mental health experts and the defendant was simply able to secure a more favorable diagnosis in postconviction.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.