769 So. 2d 974 - Asay v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
101
cited by 101 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 98 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley · Lockett v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“merely because the defendant has now secured the testimony of a more favorable mental health expert.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hertz v. State · Peede v. State“deprived the defendant of a reliable penalty phase proceeding.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Henry v. State · Mungin v. State“[T]rial counsel was not deficient where the defendant had been examined prior to trial by mental health experts and the defendant was simply able to secure a more favorable diagnosis in postconviction.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.