Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 769 SO2D 990 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

42 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Ake v. Oklahoma · United States v. Henry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Counsel's strategic decisions will not be second-guessed on collateral attack.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “entails a determination as to the credibility of the witness, this Court `will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on issues of credibility' so long as the decision is supported by competent, substantial evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Recantation by a witness called on behalf of the prosecution does not necessarily entitle a defendant to a new trial. In determining whether a new trial is warranted due to recantation of a witness's testimony, a trial judge is to examine all the circumstances of the case, including the testimony of the witnesses submitted on the motion for the new trial. "Moreover, recanting testimony is exceedingly unreliable, and it is the duty of the court to deny a new trial where it is not satisfied that such testimony is true. Especially is this true where the recantation involves a confession of perjury." Only when it appears that, on a new trial, the witness's testimony will change to such an extent as to render probable a different verdict will a new trial be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.