Hauglum v. Durst’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2017
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garza v. Alviar · Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co. · Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial Hospital · Dyson v. Olin Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen one party to an agreement has repudiated it, the other party may then accept the agreement as being terminated or consider the repudiation as a breach of contract and bring suit for damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzalez v. Denning“a fixed intention to abandon, renounce and refuse to perform the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.