Snyder v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2016
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mitchell v. Money · Daniel v. Fourth & Market, Inc. · Morris v. Morris · Cable v. Cable
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Within this jurisdiction, it is a well-recognized rule of law that any statute relating to the revivor of an action is a statute of limitation, rather than a statute relating to pleading, practice, or procedure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When read together KRS 395.278 and CR 25.01 require that when a litigant dies, any action pending with respect to him must be revived against that decedent's administration and the administrator must be substituted as the real party in interest before the action can proceed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Jackson“(1) if a party dies during the defense of an action and the claim is not thereby extinguished, the court, within the period allowed by law, may order substitution of the proper parties. If substitution is not so made the action may be dismissed as to the deceased party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.