Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 77 ARK 261 - McDonough v. Williams

McDonough v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
12
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co. (1983), Tuttle v. Stovall (1910)

5 federal appellate · 60 state decisions — followed in 12 states

200190519101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmidt v. Mesmer · Johnson v. Culver · Whitney v. . Allaire · Thompson v. Libby · Haven v. Neal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An executory contract which has been procured by fraud is not binding upon the party against whom the fraud has been perpetrated. He may, after discovering the fraud, either perform, it or rescind it, and if with knowledge of the fraud he elects to perform it this is equivalent to his making a new contract, and to permit him, under those circumstances to recover for a fraud would be to do violence to every rule upon which compensatory damages are allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.