In Re Indreland’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2015
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1222 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225 · 11 U.S.C. § 363
Relies on Brite v. Sun Country Development · In Re Rott · In Re Janssen Charolais Ranch, Inc. · In Re Fursman Ranch · United States v. Welco Industries, Inc. (In Re Welco Industries, Inc.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The test to be applied is set forth in In re Jannson Charolais Ranch, Inc., 73 B.R. 125, 128 , 4 Mont.B.R. 290 (Bankr.Mont.1987) where the proper rate of interest and loan term is determined by the prevailing market for the type and quality of the loan at issue. In re Welco Industries, 60 B.R. 880, 882, 883 (BAP 9th Cir.1986). See also, In re Lewis Industries, 73 B.R. 862, 869 , 4 Mont.B.R. 434, 446-447 (Bankr.Mont.1987).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.